tpo 46
Both the author and the lecturer discuss the superiority of electronic databases to paper-based information for recording medical information. The author believes that electronic databases are more reliable and they overweight paper-based record keeping. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She believes that reasons given by the author are illegal.
As for the first reason, the author mentions that electronic records can reduce costs of saving information. It is mentioned that paper databases need lots of space and finding a proper place to store them may cost a lot, while electronic records do not need any space. The lecturer, on the other hand mentions that doctors who use electronic databases, use papers too, and they keep papers as an emergency record. Therefore, a space to keep papers is still needed and not only this would not decrease the costs, but also may increase it.
Secondly, the author believes that by using electronic databases, errors relating to awful handwriting, improper materials of the paper or these kinds of things will be diminished. The lecturer casts doubt on this claim. She mentions that while checking patients, doctors use pen and paper to take notes and an office staff will convert this information to an electronic database later. Therefore, there is a chance to have mistakes and errors.
Finally, the author states that electronic databases help researches because they are easier to be accessed from any place. The lecturer rebuts this claim. She suggests that there are some strict rules for accessing this data and patients can block their information and prevent others to see them. Consequently, doctors may need to go through very strict laws and permissions, even from the patient, to get the information they need.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-30 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | afgmar | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | yasamiamirreza | 70 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | 70 | view |
- TPO 46-Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24125874126 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70639534693 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.5348145442 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6875 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42847018638 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13033018897 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105199235193 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247921430536 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693144485911 0.0443174109184 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.