Many criminals re-offend after they have been punished. Why do some people continue to commit crimes after they have been punished, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?
The re-offence of prisoners after being released tends to become a seriously fundamental issue in many countries. This essay explores the causative agents of this as well as proposes some positive solutions.
The prison systems considered as the first reason exacerbate the situation. Because of mixing criminals together instead of separating based on the committing levels, it is hard to prevent from bullying and the negative influences, which directly impact to both behaviors and spirits of offenders, and then, undoubtedly, they could re-offend in the short time. Secondly, were someone to commit once in their life, they would receive the criminal record. In other words, this person needs to write all what he had done into his CV, so finding out a job after being release turns to more difficult. Additionally, most prisoners are poverty, unemployment and lack of education, they have no other ways to make a living, but offending. By many relevant grounds, the re-offence is not totally impossible although they have just been released.
The national governments are responsible for solving this issue. To improve prisons’ educational level, the academic and vocational training should be provided in the jail. Besides, it is suggested that the accommodation between offenders and the public should be held throughout some special kinds of activities that the criminals can feel useful for their local communities as well as narrow down the discriminating gap in society. Finally, by giving the job opportunities for the prisoners after being released, governments are able to help them think positively and earn money by their own ability. It is no easy to carry out those measures, but utterly possible to reduce the re-offence.
In conclusion, the accurate estimation of governments and society are very important in reducing the number of the criminals, especially those who re-offend after they have been punished.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | junjunh | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-06 | LUCIALUSO | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-26 | Nguyễn Thanh Bình | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | tranthutra17 | 56 | view |
- Some peole claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirements.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 61
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older? 53
- Health experts claim that walking is one of the best ways to keep good health, but less and less people walking in daily life. What are the reason and how to encourage people to walk more? 89
- Essay topic: Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can government do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 84
- Some believe IQ determines how well students perform at school, others think perseverance is the key to academic success. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38157894737 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94445932562 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644736842105 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.307297964 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334032652492 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936426810184 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739220569976 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196578635707 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742573974477 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.