Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think is it a positive or negative development?
There is no doubt that countries are developing as fast as they can and boundaries are disappeared. People, also, have the capability to purchase the products which are the same in all corners of the world. From my perspective it has both benefits and negative effects in developing countries.
The first challenge is that products which are scattered around the world are almost always famous brands and they usually outsell the local products; hence, local products are doomed to failure. In some developing countries, for instance, most individuals prefer to buy clothes from famous brands instead of supporting local ones since they hold that local brands do not have high quality; so, unfortunately the small businesses go bankrupt and many people lose their jobs. The second point is that it destroys the creativity of the countries importing goods and does not let talented people to develop their ideas. A prime example attesting to this argument is people who design items for souvenir shops when nobody buys from them, they would be fired.
On the other hand, by selling products countries become familiar and it prevents prejudice against each other. A typical example are some cancer medicines which our country could not make and as they were produced in a country that was against us. But, because of high demands the medicines were imported and countries forgot prejudice. Furthermore, each country is well-known for producing specific products and since all countries want to bring prosperity, they should share their products. For example, Iran is professional in producing high quality carpets and weak in making mobile; therefore, they export carpet and import mobile phones.
All in all, it can be deduced that spite of the fact that local businesses should be propped up, we cannot deny the fact that benefits of international companies outweigh the drawbacks.
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
- many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country 58
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both vi 67
- car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam.how true do you think this statement is?what measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars? 67
- some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. they say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. to what extend do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20723684211 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61010771991 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.868783513 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.769230769 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179788303233 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066805940774 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325570633388 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993497045099 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607141550092 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.