tpo-46
In the reading, the author claims that storing patients's medical records in electronic databases is far beeter than keeping them in paper-based format by pointing out 3 reasons of support. However, finding all reasons questionable and implausibe, the lecturer repudiates the claim and presents some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that using electronic databases may lead to cost reduction by eliminating demands for a significant amount of storage space, copying, faxing or transporting paper records. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that use of electronic record in unlikely to reduce the cost significantly. Owing to the fact that by using electrical forms the signatures of the patients below the forms are still required , besides the use of electronic forms papers should be used too.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that electronic medical records makes errors prevented since legible computer fonts and standardization of forms minimize the possibility of human error. That being said, the lecturer disputes this idea by clarifying the fact that even doctors use electronical records they still take notes and write prescription. If their handwriting is illegible or the assistant staffs cannot interpret them correctly, it will cause errors which may have terrible implications for patients.
Finally, the author draws attention to aiding medical research by easily access to a plethora electronic documents as the last advantage of electronic databases. Yet again, the lecturer dismisses it by pointing out that access to all forms and patients' documents is subject to privacy laws. If researchers want to collect data from these resources, they should do complex procedures and also get permission from the patients who are unlikely to give it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 434, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ients below the forms are still required , besides the use of electronic forms pap...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, conversely, finally, first, however, if, may, so, still, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46428571429 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89962875413 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610714285714 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2521152237 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 139.090909091 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465299183215 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155526359765 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912835656359 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249671012117 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355715833715 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.7273730684 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.