tpo24
Both the reading and lecturer are about a new discovered fossil which includes some actual tissues of the animal. The mentioned animal is Tyrannosaurus rex. In the research, scientists could find some worthwhile minerals inside T.rex's leg bone such as blood vessels, red cells and collagen. The article provides three reasons to support these findings. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and finds all of them dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that researchers recognized some small branching channels inside leg bone of T.rex which were similar to blood vessels in bones and its hollows, meanwhile they could explore a soft, flexible substance into of channels and they predicted that the aforementioned substance may have been remains of real blood vessels. This point is challenged by the professor and he points out that a soft substance is not blood necessarily. After a live organism dies up, the bacteria would colonize inside its bones and hollows; hence, these remains may be a trace of their activities.
Secondly, the article contends that several spheres were found in the T.rexs' bone; therefore, they could have been red blood cells. Furthermore, these spheres were in the size of red cells and also they had iron which is crucial for transporting oxygen to tissues; conversely, the lecturer claims that scholars discovered plentiful of other animals' fossil at the same place - which they did not have any red cell when they were alive- with these same spheres; thus, the mentioned spheres must have had another origin such as reddish minerals.
Finally, the reading passage states that collagen which is a kind of fibrous protein was found in T.rex's bone. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer and he poses that we know that collagen would not last more than 100 years; however, T.rex's bone belongs 70-million years ago. There is a possibility that collagen has been transported to bone by researchers' hand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 342, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
... scholars discovered plentiful of other animals fossil at the same place - which they d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12037037037 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54739871961 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567901234568 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 105.581567783 49.2860985944 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 127.615384615 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468204966946 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154523242196 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922932714201 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264386229339 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322943393711 0.0443174109184 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.