Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A topic that has recently become a long-running dispute among public all around the world, is whether air travel benefit ordinary people or rich people. Although it is highly argued that air travel brings more advantages for the rich, I am inclined to believe that both ordinary and rich individuals would benefit from travelling by planes.
From an environmental perspective, air travel is indeed bound to environmental issues, which means that it would lead to both a lower price of fossil fuels and a lower cost of tickets. For example, a group of profound environmentalists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between bearing the consequences and being more environmentally friendly as well as the latest advancements in the planes’ industry. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the connection that offering economy class tickets is positively correlated with not only the ease of air travel but also with being more affordable.
In economic terms, there is little room for doubt that the air transportation is attributable to being the most expensive means of transportation, in that it would lead to encouraging the most affluent individuals, discouraging the lower class people, and being less attractive for ordinary people. A well-known example of such attributions is the privileged people in wealthy countries, which is cause or concern since it had been mistaken in taking more money as granted. Thus, it is obvious that air travel could play a significant role in the number of rich travelers.
Considering all the reasons discussed above, the advantages of air travel for both ordinary and rich people are of high significance. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-27 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Jaskaransingh11 | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Ramanpreetsingh | 70 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | Prabhjot Sanghera | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-31 | Ahmed145 | 55 | view |
- Medical technology is responsiblefor the human's life expectancy. Towhat extent do you agree ordisagree? 77
- The information revolution has changed the ways of mass communication andhas some negative and positive effects on individual’s lives as well as onsociety. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- Business and financial organizations need to hard work to environmental challenges. 88
- The information revolution has changed the ways of mass communication andhas some negative and positive effects on individual’s lives as well as onsociety. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
A topic that has recently become a long-running dispute among public all around the wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on, in that it would lead to encouraging the most affluent individuals, discourag...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41946308725 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21262942048 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587248322148 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.6078015028 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.5 104.977214359 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8 20.9669160288 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252042055159 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1074598185 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834582364476 0.071462118173 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158594146935 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655387206723 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.