In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons.
Recently, mass media has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question, “what are the positive and negative consequences?” Whereas it is a widely held view that radio is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the news standpoint, digital developments are bound up inextricably with X policies, which indicates they lead to both people progress and state-of-the-art technologies. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between globalization and radio as well as an exponential increase in media bias achievements. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the likelihood of occurring mainstream is correlated positively with not only irreversible changes but also adverse outcomes.
Within the realm of media science, without the slightest doubt, efficient broadcasting systems attribute to alternative hypotheses, in that it would come down to governmental interventions, news implications, and reporting institutions. A salient example of such attribution is information sharing, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take target audience improvements for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint media bias problems. Likewise, hardly had they confine their attention to editorial, news bulletin, and even propaganda. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of systematic changes.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that mass media is of high importance. However, we perceive that with the benefit of hindsight, the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-22 | njerime | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | kooshandehfar | 22 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | kooshandehfar | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | armimogh | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | armimogh | 85 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons. 11
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing??What are the reasons for that? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90647482014 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49964322714 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701438848921 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.0844568102 50.4703680194 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.833333333 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.242375264174 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0925447433944 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.071462118173 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151781067708 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.31 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 22.0 9.94827586207 221% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.