Do you agree or disagree? People nowadays are more willing to help other people (giving food or clothing) than in the past.
Throughout history people tend to help each other. Although many believe people more help each other in the past, I, on the other hand, believe individual are more tend to help people in need today than before. I will address the most discernible reasons why I feel this way in the following.
To begin with, internet has a great influence in our life. According to new survey, today people spend at least 5 hour of their time in internet, and almost 90 percent of this time dedicated to social networks such as Facebook, Twitter and so on. This social networks provide good opportunity for charity to advertise themselves. Accordingly, more people will see them and they could help them. However, most people tend to help charity in tradition way. Which mean they give them money, but, most of them accept intact or even second hands good. In the past people could not access to these kind of charities, and they did not know what is people in need really need, thus, they only helped people in need near them. For instance, Last month a big earth quake hit western Iran and many people lost their home. If it happen in the past, many of them were relay to government help, because other people could not know what is their need and how could they helped them. But, because of social networks, people in my country noticed what they needed and used internet van renting start-up to sent them what they needed. This example illustrate that people in this era tend to help others because they know what they need exactly.
Moreover, nowadays people social commitment has been increased than the past. Hence, more parents help charity in front of their children, when they go shopping they help charity while their child seeing them. Not only that but also, more schools encourage pupils to help charity. My own experinece is a compelling example of this. When I was child when I went shopping with may parents they gave money to me to give that to charity. When I grow up when my parents went shopping I bought something such as candy or even chep shose with my own money and gave them to people in need. My parents work encouraged me to did that.
In conclusion, It is for all the aforementioned reasons, I firmly believe people are more willing to help other than before. This is because of social networks people can help more than before to others, and because people social commitment increased, parents encourage their child more than before to help charities.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer 85
- Agree or disagree Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together 69
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is easier to become an educated person today than it was in the past Use reasons and examples to support your position 79
- Writing task one TPO 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most people can solve important problems in their lives by themselves or with the help of their families Help from the government is unnecessary 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...w survey, today people spend at least 5 hour of their time in internet, and almost 9...
^^^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... In the past people could not access to these kind of charities, and they did not know wha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 818, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'happens'?
Suggestion: happens
... and many people lost their home. If it happen in the past, many of them were relay to...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 856, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'relaid', 'relayed'.
Suggestion: relaid; relayed
...t happen in the past, many of them were relay to government help, because other peopl...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1131, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'illustrates'.
Suggestion: illustrates
...ent them what they needed. This example illustrate that people in this era tend to help ot...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rinece is a compelling example of this. When I was child when I went shopping with m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, so, thus, while, at least, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70276497696 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27346506899 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47465437788 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7753617453 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7391304348 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8695652174 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21739130435 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327638097364 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115520405652 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101979660529 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257354382122 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849133465242 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.