The graph compares the percentage of theinternational and the percentage of UK student gaining second class degrees or better at a major UK university.
The bar chart shows the proportion of international students and UK students in terms of achieving second class degrees and higher in seven different subJects at a University in the UK.
In general terms, the chart shows that international and UK had different strengths when studying for degrees and better in this UK university.
It is clear from the bar chart show that degree results were generally good for both international and UK students with over 50% gaining a second class degrees and better in all seven subjects except English literature and International Law. International students tended to do better than UK students in Electrical engineering and Information technology. Whereas over 80% of International students gained a good degree in IT, only about a half of UK students did so.
Thr percentage of International and UK students who gained a good degree were similar for the two subjects in Nursing and Accountancy ( about 75% and 60% respectively). In Art history and Sociology subjects, UK students tended to do better. Especially, nearly three-quarter of UK students gained a second class degree or better in international Law while only a half of the International students achieved in this level.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 71
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 61
- The Internet has many disadvantages as it does advantagesTo what extent do you agree with this statement? 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... two subjects in Nursing and Accountancy about 75% and 60% respectively. In Art h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20304568528 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16879773491 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482233502538 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7152831129 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.125 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415778861219 0.215688989381 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222519655685 0.103423049105 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387225387894 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291675912477 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497962934301 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.