The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given illustration depicts the post-graduation qualification of Australian male and female in 1999. As is observed, female were more in numbers in case of undergraduate diploma and bachelor degree while male outnumbered female in all other levels.
In this chart, almost 90% of males are having the skilled vocational diploma, while only approximately 10% of females are having the same qualifications. In contrast, nearly 70% of women obtain the qualifications of undergraduate diploma, which the number is twice larger than the number of males. However, the percentages of females and males who graduate from universities are similar, which are around 55% and 45%, respectively.
After getting a degree or diploma in the universities or colleges, it seems that males prefer to keep enhancing their knowledge or skills in schools. The chart also indicates that no matter postgraduate diploma or master’s degree, more males are likely to study for. Near 70% of males are holding the postgraduate diploma and 60% men graduated from graduate programs. For females, only 30% have already studied for obtaining the qualification of a Postgraduate Diploma. For the master’s degree, 40% of women already hold the qualifications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-03 | mone49 | 61 | view |
2019-09-08 | wardiati | 73 | view |
2019-06-22 | saeed2751366 | 84 | view |
2019-04-12 | jasonielts | 61 | view |
2018-10-18 | xenocide | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 83
- The diagrams show a structure that is used to generate electricity from wave power.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 90
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...outnumbered female in all other levels. In this chart, almost 90% of males are h...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50785340314 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29169094805 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581151832461 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2398494449 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.2 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0656017378884 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321492419653 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281345480189 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0491267131262 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00707156771397 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.