The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitor how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table and the charts provide information regarding the visitors and their appreciation after coming to Ashdown Museum in the year before and the year after it was refurbished.
It is obvious that the number of guests growth significantly and the feedback of them also became better.
To be specific, the figure for visitors that went to Ashdown Museum jumped to 92000 right the year after it was innovated. It was an impressive number. Moreover, in the same period, the positive replies were higher. People who said they were very satisfied, as well as satisfied, peaked at 75%, with 35% for very satisfied comments and 40% for satisfied comments. This is a clear evidence that the quality of the museum improved considerably.
In contrast, visitors that had dissatisfied experiences fell down from 10% to 5%. Besides, there was a small number of people who did not give any response about museum’s services, at about 5 %.
- Individuals can do nothing to improve our environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 74
- The charts show women's highest education in 1945 and 1995. Summarise the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many people work at home using modern technology today Some people think only workers benefit from this not the employers To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
- The charts below show proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in 6 areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...down from 10% to 5%. Besides, there was a small number of people who did not give any response ab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03870967742 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79959463347 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638709677419 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9490079507 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7777777778 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323788157419 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111549746227 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109786200175 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177333538884 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139740098849 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.