Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet and they can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the advent of the Internet, that e-learning courses could be possible to replace going to campus has evolved a major topic of concern in the era of information. While studying from home could do wonder for some extent, I strongly believe that formal education plays an indispensable role in student’s development.
Obviously, the Internet could enable student approach knowledge and explore fields of interest conveniently and accessibly, especially for those who inhabiting in advantageous area or approaching education are restricted by distance constrain. In paralleled with the widespread of the Internet, the proliferation of free education website or online informative resources has made people to access easily than ever before. By browsing these website, students are likely to enrich their knowledge without spending considerable amount of time to commute to school. For example, children who are interested in English have numerous opportunities to improve skills by videos made by the experienced native speakers and imitating their accents. This breakthrough is useful not only English but also wide range of subjects including science ones with vivid videos and animated lessons.
On the other hand, I am in favor of the idea that e-learning never completely replace the crucial role of formal education. Regarding to mental development that virtue education hardly to accommodate. School is where young children to nurture socially acceptable behavior and hone vital interpersonal skills. This is because children are required to respect their teachers, share toys with their classmate and collaborate with them. I personally think that personality development is more crucial than knowledge-centered education for impressionable young individuals. Therefore, teacher’s supervision plays a pivotal part, not to mention that it also safeguards against exposure to external potential harm. If they study from home, they may be higher at risk of pornography or violent content
In conclusion, although studying from the Internet is visibly beneficial, I personally believe that school is a great place for children's well-rounded development.
- The given bar charts indicate the proportion of money that people in France, Germany and England spent on food and other products in 1998 and 2008. 61
- The given pie charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or pursuing further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 64
- the table below describes victims by age group and offence category in Venezuela 1999 70
- People think that children nowadays have more freedom To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
- the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by Tourist Information Office in one city a six month period in 2011 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this website' or 'these websites'?
Suggestion: this website; these websites
...ss easily than ever before. By browsing these website, students are likely to enrich their kn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for childrens well-rounded development.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78504672897 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20268615241 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638629283489 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1479983867 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.642857143 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128174954732 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367855717767 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490715982315 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086078617444 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297778017479 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.