People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, whitewater river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why?
Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous sports and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the number of overcoming athlete fears is highly rewarding, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that facing up the problems can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From adventures sports standpoint, being keen on exciting sports can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that sporty persons, as well as stressful situations, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered rivalry among sportswomen. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both physical and mental injuries and chances of permanent injuries apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of risk-taking sports, disturbing body might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of spectators. Moreover fundamental aspects of participants relate to this reality that demerits of boosting Adrenalin pertain to vigorous workout. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that the downside of strenuous exercise is correlated negatively with suffering from serious injuries. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of exciting sports.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that benefits of life-threatening activities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of lucrative sports prove the significance of exciting sports, but also pinpoint developing self-confidence implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-05 | mehdi.mehdi2 | 11 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | Mahdi_Farhani | 11 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | Mahdi_Farhani | 11 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | Mahdi_Farhani | 11 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | Mahdi_Farhani | 11 | view |
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 88
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 88
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons. 85
- What is the best invention of last 100 years?and explain why? 11
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...atastrophic consequences of spectators. Moreover fundamental aspects of participants rel...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Adrenalin) must be used with a third-person verb: 'pertains'.
Suggestion: pertains
...ity that demerits of boosting Adrenalin pertain to vigorous workout. As a tangible exam...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94921875 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3345718626 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6953125 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9804021737 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.916666667 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.045038305222 0.242375264174 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0166397633097 0.0925447433944 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0210656259708 0.071462118173 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0275710531556 0.151781067708 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228690651048 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.23 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.4 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.