The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.
The graph provided reveals matrimony and separation between of population of the UN from 1970 - 2000, and also the marital status of residents the USA in 1970 and 2000.
Then marriage and divorce rates of the USA’s adults had almost been steady then had dropped slightly, and divorced citizens fluctuated. Marital status had not large percentage difference, but marriage status had double numbered distinction in 1970 and 2000.
It is evident that the first two periods, matrimony of grownup portion had stable- standing at 2,5 million, and next two periods were decreased by mere 0,5 each- accounted 2 million in 2000. Besides, the separation gauge of Americans had rose with small numbers then fallen to it’s the first gauge. Which means the 1 million separated adults have grown approximate 0.4 million in 1980, however, declined to 1 million in 2000.
On the other hand, marriage status has virtually 5% variant in 1970 and 2000, except for the married status. The never married individuals in 1970 had 15% and 2000 was 20%. Moreover, the widowed and divorced percentages were at in the vicinity of 8%. In contrast, the allied people in the poll dropped by around 11 percent which means 70% of 1970 become 59% in 2000.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-21 | khanhptk162 | 67 | view |
2019-11-21 | khanhptk162 | 67 | view |
2019-11-12 | Nisha_k | 73 | view |
2019-10-22 | abelin | 73 | view |
2019-09-06 | Ali Rizwan | 67 | view |
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years. 89
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing.Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 78
- the graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 84
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 56
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of residents the USA in 1970 and 2000. Then marriage and divorce rates of the U...
^^^
Line 4, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h means 70% of 1970 become 59% in 2000.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, except for, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00485436893 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53792903879 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601941747573 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9610900836 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.1 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 5.23603664747 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310662538093 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119782735026 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763476485414 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19660763773 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690084876807 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.