The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010. 150 words
The given bar graphs show data on the percentage of computer ownership from the year 2002 to 2010, with further classification by level of education.
Overall, an increasing number of people who owned computer due to the timeline and the level of education. The computer ownership increased over the years and the major part of this ownership was the people with higher studies.
According to the first graph, more than 50% people owned computers in 2002 and this percentage increased consistently. After 6 years this percentage reached to over 60% and finally in 2010 the percentage of people who owned computers reached to over 70%.
An analysis of data by level of education shows that the percentage of computer ownership increased with the education level. For instance, 15% of the people who had High school graduation owned computers in 2002 and this percentage were about 60 for Bachelor degree holders and over 80 for the postgraduate degree holders. After 8 years, in 2010, the same trend could be observed and the percentage of people who owned computers increased significantly compared to 2002.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-01 | welly | 67 | view |
2019-11-25 | sandeep kour | 78 | view |
2019-11-16 | RahulM | 78 | view |
2019-11-13 | Murodjon Mamadjonov | 78 | view |
2019-11-07 | marchjkd@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDiscuss both the 89
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 92
- The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe. The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries. 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.» You should write 73
- homeschooling 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 472, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncreased significantly compared to 2002.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15934065934 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78118060972 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483516483516 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5656615766 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.375 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345083419861 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175828298248 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756499194654 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24399244007 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871832722288 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.