Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In present context, technology has exponentially increase in all parts of the world. Nowadays, the methods of interaction among the folks has been drastically changed due to technology. From my point of view, I think technology has affected the several types of relationship. This essay will examine the ways and its positive development.
It is obvious that people nowadays are quite busy with different technology. The types of relationship they created through several social media are likely to break sooner. In addition to this, pupils are much more fascinated towards the use of social networking sites such as Facebook, Viber, Instagram, Whatsapp and so forth. People are having conversation through text, audio and video with the use of such sites rather than meeting face to face. This has affected the way people in the past used to create the kinds of relationship. For instance, a recent study has shown that in England almost 80% of the total population are quite busy in using social medias. Also, they tend to establish their relationship with other through only such technology. Thus, it has significantly changed the types of relations created in the past.
Despite of some drawbacks of technology, there are several benefits of technology. It has led many countries towards the path of development. Similarly, technology has solved several health problems as well as saved the life of many human race. It has aided in several fields of medical and engineering. Furthermore, technology has created a platform where we can get connected to our lovable ones. It is the technology that reflects the country’s status around the world. For illustration, my big brother who lives in Australia is able to connect with us visually with the help of such technology.
In conclusion, even though, potential arguments are there for considering technology as negative aspects to human in some extent, I believe that technology should be used wisely and properly for the welfare of mankind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Ngochai | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Harrynguyen1980 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Garrett | 84 | view |
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 78
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 84
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 69
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...t context, technology has exponentially increase in all parts of the world. Nowadays, th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...properly for the welfare of mankind.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, similarly, so, thus, well, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23529411765 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91020683748 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56346749226 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2513448026 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.55 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.15 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291877091272 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793222123035 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612987912257 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155069929482 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528473310516 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.