Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
One of the conspicuous topic of today’s contemporary era is waste disposal. Although some countries are taking stricter action towards waste disposable laws, some people believe it should be producers responsibility to minimise over packaging, whereas some disagree with this notion. This essay will discuss, how consumers and producers can work collaboratively to encourage eco-friendly shopping.
Firstly, overpacking of products can be adverse effect on environment. Not only it’s responsible for mass deforestation, but also result in price hike in products. For instance, burgers from McDonald’s are over packed and consumers change their littering habits. This can be avoided if producers indulge in minimal packaging, which will be beneficial in keeping the environment clean. Therefore we can say producers can take first initiative to utilise less packaging.
Secondly, consumers should pledge aligence and take environment seriously. Small effort in making changes to feeble ways of shopping can make an enormous change in our environment. For example, using recyclable bags, shopping at farmers market, make a constitutional effort to dispose garbage in the bins. Hence we can say, consumers making correct disposable choice can minimise the risk of a unhealthy environment.
To conclude, this essay discussed how producers and buyers can take appropriate steps to make eco- friendly choice which will immensely benefit our environment. In my opinion, produce and consumers having a collective approach can radicate emerging issues related to overpacking and make planet earth a better place to live.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Mahdi_Farhani | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | lovepreetdhillon | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- Illiterate of future would not be one who does not know to read, but people who do not know how to learn. 76
- Marketing strategy for big companies should be placed on offer and discounts, and in what ways this can impact on their reputation. 72
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- People usually mix their private and professional life What are the pros and cons 69
- Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...icial in keeping the environment clean. Therefore we can say producers can take first ini...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... effort to dispose garbage in the bins. Hence we can say, consumers making correct di...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...posable choice can minimise the risk of a unhealthy environment. To conclude,...
^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...essay discussed how producers and buyers can take appropriate steps to make eco- ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.825 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1271215021 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641666666667 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.371616972 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8571428571 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115051014479 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043016317537 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266425596637 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718441796157 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378645662085 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.