Euthanasia
Recently, the phenomenon of euthanasia or easy death and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that is painless death highly beneficial, this issue is regarded both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the deliberate killing of a patient can be a plus and I explain it throughout this essay.
Form the ethical point of view, severe illnesses can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are stemmed from the fact that incurable diseases as well as coma, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an experiment which discovered the religious aspects of murder. Therefore, the beneficial ramifications of both fighting for survival and human right apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of law, mercy killing might increase the consequences of public approval. Moreover, fundamental aspects of legal factor relate to this reality that the demerits of physician assisted suicide pertain to legalized method. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a high prestigious university has asserted that the downside of paralyzed person is negatively correlated with improper killing method. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of mentally disabled person.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of painlessly killing an ill person by far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of suffering severe pain prove the significance of suicide, but also pinpoint euthanasia implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-07 | honorrr | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | yasamin.gharib62 | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | khehra mandeep | 74 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | sant bir singh | 80 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53488372093 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14537689786 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5207350082 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0907236111257 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350588021995 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784829703761 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0576973260096 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579420845421 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.