Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The group will be helped more by person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do.
One of the main issues in team-working is the method of cooperation of the group members. It has a profound effect on the performance and the final outcomes of the group's activities. While some people believe that a person with his own activities regardless the other member's preferences can be useful for a group, other people, including me, have an opposite viewpoint. I firmly believe that the group will be successful in the assigned tasks when each person acts according to the other members' opinions. Not only does it make a strong relationship between the members, but also they cover the drawbacks during the activities. In what follows, the most outstanding reasons are scrutinized to clarify the paramount importance of this discussion.
First and foremost, logical relationships will be made among the members of the group. When a person notices carefully to what the other members say about special issue in a group, it means that they are important for him. In fact, it is more respectful if they do according to each other's willing. Consequently, it brings them strong motivation to continue the tasks to reach the culmination of their targets. For instance, there was a time that I was working as a sales manager in an economic group. I always tried to pay attention to my colleague's requests in different circumstances. Since they had realized that I will act based on their opinions with some needed modification, it made a good sense for cooperation for them. In fact, they found out that I never ignored them in making critical decisions.
A furthermore significant point is that the group members will be able to modify the incorrect behaviors of each other. This paves the way toward the success of a group. Since the will be able to present final results with minimum risks and wrong information. Let's consider my friend's experience as an example. My friend, Ali, had been working for two years as a mechanical engineer before he changed his position as a manager. He used to collect all the needed information from the other members of the group. Then, he exactly followed the instructions step by step. Since they were compatible with the other members of the group; they didn't repudiate to notice my friend about his mistakes. As a result, he could publish final reports about a construction project without any delay or remarkable incorrect information. Had he ignored the others' opinions, he would not have achieved this level of acceptance by the government to choose him as a manager.
In brief, by taking into account all the aforementioned reasons, it seems that each person in a group should carefully notice to what the others' expectations. It is a rational strategy to help the group as an active member to reach the goals with the highest quality. Therefore, it is highly recommended to everyone who wishes to be an effective member of the groups.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | sepehrdsafaee | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | neriman | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | 3063245467 | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | as | 90 | view |
| 2019-01-31 | mariem | 70 | view |
- TPO 43 75
- playing sports teaches people more important lessons about life. 73
- Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do their work independently. 84
- Do you agree or disagree?Some people take the view that older children can take care of younger children, some others may hold the view that taking care of children should be done by other adults. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 811, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ored them in making critical decisions. A furthermore significant point is that ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...th minimum risks and wrong information. Lets consider my friends experience as an ex...
^^^^
Line 5, column 542, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'instructions'' or 'instruction's'?
Suggestion: instructions'; instruction's
...he group. Then, he exactly followed the instructions step by step. Since they were compatibl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 638, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...th the other members of the group; they didnt repudiate to notice my friend about his...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 956, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... government to choose him as a manager. In brief, by taking into account all the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in brief, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2406.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93032786885 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84550216279 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522540983607 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 745.2 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8433666562 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1111111111 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0740740741 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.48148148148 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357394256933 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918326667067 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771909374507 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22633429535 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032507837658 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.