You stayed with your friend and by mistake carried home one Of his objects. Write a letter and explain
-how are you enjoyed staying with your friend.
-Explain the object which you brought with you by mistake and explain how much stake happened
-mention how are you plan to return on the object
Dear John
Hi! How are you? I am fine and hope you are also sailing on the same boat. The purpose of mine to penning down this Epistle is to inform you that by mistake, I took your research file with my possession.
Last month, it was a nice experience to State at your home, after such a long period. I enjoy a lot with you but one thing that I enjoyed most, what is our picnic day. Fortunately, the weather was just fabulous in that day and the ambience of the picnic destination was really great, it was breathtaking view. Moreover, yours parents are very amicable and your mother is a great cook. I still remember her Cuisines which she made for me were delicious. Furthermore we clicked a lots of memories, Bichara memorising and I remember these days with nostalgia.
As, I came up from your house suddenly because I urgently received a call from my employer about a business meeting, which was very urgent. Unfortunately, I carried your research file in my possession, when I noticed, it was too late. actually, I was in hurry to pack my bag and your file was on my bed and I seem that it was mine, that is the reason why I packed your research file in my belongings. I would promise you that I will send you this by air mail because I know it was really important for you. I am really sorry for the inconvenience which I caused you.
Wish you are good luckand pay my regards to your parents.
Yours truly
Aman
- Student Saini universities open have it was two places to live they may choose to live a University dominators they may choose to live in apartment in the community compare the advantages of living in universities housing with the advent of living in an a 56
- You stayed with your friend and by mistake carried home one Of his objects. Write a letter and explain-how are you enjoyed staying with your friend.-Explain the object which you brought with you by mistake and explain how much stake happened -mention how 84
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Give reasons f 78
- Many people believe that international tourism a bad thing for their countries.What are the reason for this?What can be done to change this negative attitude towards international tourism? 56
- Your friend has a travel company and would like you to come and work with him. 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...s which she made for me were delicious. Furthermore we clicked a lots of memories, Bichara ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
... were delicious. Furthermore we clicked a lots of memories, Bichara memorising and I r...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Actually
...ssion, when I noticed, it was too late. actually, I was in hurry to pack my bag and your...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, moreover, really, so, still, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.48453608247 254% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.03092783505 330% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 65.0 32.9175257732 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 26.3917525773 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 937.175257732 125% => OK
No of words: 266.0 206.0 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39473684211 4.54256449028 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.78020617076 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53924201567 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 127.690721649 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59022556391 0.622605031667 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 367.2 290.88556701 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.13402061856 164% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6804123711 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6763763939 44.8134815571 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0625 76.5299724578 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 16.8248392259 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 4.34317383033 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 7.41237113402 148% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247004677188 0.216113520407 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943402389488 0.0766984524023 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651846019519 0.0603063233224 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168714138447 0.12726935374 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538182438417 0.0580467560999 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 8.37731958763 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 70.7449484536 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 7.45979381443 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.89 8.71597938144 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 7.59969072165 94% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 41.2886597938 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.