Although many people value their public parks, this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
It is argued that exploiting public parks for economical advancement and accommodation is more fruitful rather than keeping empty for people. To a certain extent, I disagree with the idea of repurposing the public parks. However, I also think that these spaces can be useful for housing and developing business in a society.
Public parks can be both operational and economical. It has ample spaces, which could offer housings for the rising population in a community. For example, in Bangladesh, there are many public spaces in Dhaka city are occupied with apartment complex to meet the rising demographic demand. In addition, these places can utilize on developing business such as shopping complex to trigger the economical growth. This commercial use could open many job opportunities and resolve unemployment issue. This means that it might be another source of tax for the government budget. Therefore, replacing public parks with residential areas and business can bring the quality of living and economical developments of a country.
However, I would argue that public parks should not be emerged for the above functions. Public parks can ensure the healthy living of a community. It allows elder people to carry out different activities which are rejuvenating after a day’s hard work. It also helps us to live near the nature, and children can play games and sports which might keep them active and energetic. A recent BBC documentary shows that in Japan, visiting Park for 15minutes in a day can improve the human body immune system which is preventive for depression. Thus, parks have greater value to keep fit our physical and mental well being.
In conclusion, it seems that keeping public parks is more significant rather than utilising for business and housing of a country.
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 76
- Some people think that educated people are more valuable than people who have learned skills through experience Do you think that educated people are the most valuable for society What kinds of skills can people learn through experience that can benefit s 68
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones.How important is it to maintain old buildings?Should history stand in the way of progress? 67
- The role of education is to prepare children for the modern world Schools should cut art and music out of the curriculum so that children can focus on useful subjects such as information technology To what extent do you agree 85
- Some people think that intelligence is innate while others think that we can improve our intelligence through learning. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...such as shopping complex to trigger the economical growth. This commercial use could open ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 679, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ess can bring the quality of living and economical developments of a country. However, I...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19587628866 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77532632347 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.389615456 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9411764706 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287197465482 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964132668525 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540545047635 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182768666038 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931319767578 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.