Is that native place has imperative place to success of an individual or not
The issue that native place plays an important role in the success of an individual was debatable, has become more controversial. The substantial influence of native environment and surroundings has evoked the controversy over the potential impacts of its trend. From my perspective, I condemn the argument that native place has an imperative contribution to successful person's success. The essay will further elaborate the reasons and explanations and thus deduce the dialectic conclusion.
At the outset, myriad conspicuous reasons can be brought up to demonstrate that knowledge and guide form teachers can do wonders. The preponderant explanation lies in the fact that in order to gain success a person needs a lot more qualities and key skills. Like, the leadership and analytical skills are prerequisites for success, so these skills can be learned from professionals from various places.
Another key justification for upholding the notion is that the commitment and focus on goals are also crucial for success. Moreover, with the help of these two attributes, everybody can have success in their lives to a certain degree. Hence, the native place has no beneficial implications for successful person's life.
Precisely analysing the facts, I would like to recapitulate that success depends on the collaboration of several factors rather than just on the native place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-01 | Muhammad Azeem | 77 | view |
- Age discrimination against elderly workers should be illegal. 77
- Formal written assessment is good way to assess the children performance or not. 88
- Is that native place has imperative place to success of an individual or not 77
- Problems and solution of climate cahnge 11
- computer and its advantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...n imperative contribution to successful persons success. The essay will further elabora...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... beneficial implications for successful persons life. Precisely analysing the facts, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 214.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44859813084 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11148992477 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635514018692 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.007610481 50.4703680194 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.0 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 7.25397266985 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406356728338 0.242375264174 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148926932171 0.0925447433944 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167520108514 0.071462118173 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233362638415 0.151781067708 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15941424231 0.0609392437508 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.