Is that law can change the human behaviour?
The Issue that law can alter the human behaviour was debatable, has become more controversial. The substantial influence of law to modify the human nature has evoked the controversy over the potential impact of its trend in recent years. From my perspective, I totally endorse the statement that rules and regulations have significant influential implications in order to modify the human behaviour. The essay will further elaborate the reasons and explanations for supporting the notion and will deduce the dialectic conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad conspicuous reasons, which can be brought up justify that legislation are the fundamental element to build a violence free society where vulnerable and law abiding citizens are protected under the judicial system. The preponderant explanation lies in the fact that the sense of punishment and hefty fines always deter the individuals to break the law. For instance, smuggling illegal drugs will definitely lead the criminals toward capital punishment.
Another key justification upholding the notion is that law is crucial to bring harmony and peace in society. The regulations and their implementation by law enforcement force the offenders not commit the offence. For example, traffic laws are necessary to run the smooth traffic on road, not following the laws will cause devastating consequences. Moreover, the fatal accidents due to unlawful acts will surge the financial as well as human cost.
Precisely analysing the facts, I would like to recapitulate that law definitely mould the human behaviour and pivotal for the sake of better society.
- Talk about the pros/cons of this era as is full of daily invention. Any recent invention that you think proved beneficial or detrimental to society. 77
- Is that the formal written examination is a effective way to guage the children or not, what's your take on it. 96
- Is that law can change the human behaviour? 85
- Talk about the pros/cons of this era as is full of daily invention. Any recent invention that you think proved beneficial or detrimental to society. 77
- Climate change. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge the financial as well as human cost. Precisely analysing the facts, I would l...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.476 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00913010686 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9210157686 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.083333333 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344810669648 0.242375264174 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114442066156 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992513804248 0.071462118173 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19735977032 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706115266914 0.0609392437508 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.