Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people, while others say that technology has the opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is a clear point that due to increasing developments on technology has created class differences between low-segment people and rich society. This essay agree that this trend has been damaging our relationships because of its some negative sides and will discuss both points of view in forthcoming paragraphs.
On the one hand, technology could increase the gap between rich and poor. It does mean that all rich people of today’s World have smartphones, laptops, wireless and so on, therefore people in develop countries can able to work from home or from anywhere in the World. Regardless of places or time, they can do shopping online through the net or received any knowledge what they want.As a result of these ease , this technology improves their quality of life. For instance, a survey has done by Oxford College has shown that %28 of Oxford population are using distance techonolog to finish their daily duties instead of coming to Office.
On the other hand, as we know that many people in third-world countries did not have normal telephones now cell phones in compared to rich ones. Also, even though the internet is spreading to all parts of the World, there are still a number of people who do not have Access to it. When we look at these differences and lack of opportunities , it can not be sait same thing in terms of poor people and their lives. According to World Health, for example, one of three of World population has not still used electric and other gadget due to living far away.
In conclusion, despite there are many pros of using high technology, we can sure that it contribute to increase abyss between humans.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-07 | Gokhan_Kurt | 73 | view |
- Government investment in the visual arts, the kind you commonly see in art galleries, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 73
- The cheap airlines are enabling an increasing number of people to travel to foreign countries. What advantages might there be to society in general? 84
- Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people, while others say that technology has the opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'agrees'.
Suggestion: agrees
...ent people and rich society. This essay agree that this trend has been damaging our r...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...r received any knowledge what they want.As a result of these ease , this technolog...
^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...what they want.As a result of these ease , this technology improves their quality ...
^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... all parts of the World, there are still a number of people who do not have Acces...
^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...se differences and lack of opportunities , it can not be sait same thing in terms ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, still, therefore, third, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85512367491 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63190641237 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614840989399 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.7421683274 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.909090909 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0909090909 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228422555912 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891746675358 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784363874762 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126748743172 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553250468707 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.