Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Is this a positive or negative development?Give reasons for your answer and include any r

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.

In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?

Is this a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

Write at least 250 words.

It is evident that all kind of relationship have been influenced by technology in variety of ways. This essay will outline the main positive and negative aspects of this.

The principal way in which relationship have been affected by technology is that nowadays it tends to be at distance rather than to be face-to-face, which are very important on a personal level to human beings. The social networks, as Facebook or Twitter, have contributed to revolutionize the relationship. If people develop the majority of their relationship online, they could have some problems to be part of society. A great from reality is also caused by technology. Many young people, for example, live with a smartphone on their hands all day long. In this way they don’t realize what happens around them even when they are with friends or with other people.

However, despite these negative aspects, the quality of long-distance relationship has been improved by the advent of the internet. The internet has very simplified the work relationship. For instance, the business owners can work at home with their PC and can attend a meeting without making many kilometres to achieve the office in a foreign city. Not only this, the online instant messaging, like WhatsApp, has improved the communication, for example, between parents and sons who study abroad. Based on this prospective, technology has influenced relationship in a positive way.

In conclusion, technology has brought a positive development in ways people interact with each other. Overall, the negative aspects have been outweighed by those positive, such as shorten the commute with loved ones, or in the job world to plan the meeting.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-30 Ngochai 89 view
2020-01-29 pratik.dadhaniya 84 view
2020-01-29 pratik.dadhaniya 56 view
2020-01-03 Harrynguyen1980 89 view
2019-11-27 Garrett 84 view
Essays by user SilviaD :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... positive and negative aspects of this. The principal way in which relationship ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are with friends or with other people. However, despite these negative aspects,...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 565, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... technology has influenced relationship in a positive way. In conclusion, technology has brou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ghed by those positive, such as shorten the commute with loved ones, or in the job world to...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21978021978 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93285611602 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600732600733 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9594513257 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338338986421 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106841772112 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993871337976 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195183996843 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484917220259 0.056905535591 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.