A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Whether to employ a common national curriculum or not is a burning question which has indulged scholars and policy makers of the country in a hot debate. Like most cases, this answer to this issue also has its merits and demerits. However, a true and consummate picture of the two options available can only be painted after a discussing the issue using a holistic approach, weighing the pros and cons of each choice. It is the responsibility of the state to ensure that its citizens have equal opportunity for learning and growth. It is this responsibility which shifts the weight of this discussion on a common national curriculum side.
In a country, for example, one can argue that since there are students who dwell in different societies with different backgrounds. One locality may be under-developed and others may possess a burgeoning economy. Therefore, if it is left for private instittutions to formulate different parallel sets of curriculum for students of the same level, then this will result in the rise of a grave educational disparaty. Students studying from two different curriculums will not attain a similar level of breadth of knowledge. At College level, there is a standard curriculum therefore students who havent covered those topics will find it difficult to cope up with advanced knowledge. This will result in a performance gap which is instrinsic in nature due to different curriculums.
There may be questions raised by some over the complete commonality of the curriculum, since it is wthout doubt that different states have different cultures and industrial setups. A state may want to eduacte its student son its own history and language. This does not fit well with the idea of a common curriculum. Othe states may want to inculcate those knowledge areas in its students which are important to thrive in thier industry. Therefore, it can not be denied that a national curriculum must be developed catering most needs.
It is observed that many private institutions also have their own curriculum. Therefore, two parallel curriculums make it difficult for students to compete on equal ground at the College level. One system may emphasize more on breadth of knowledge while one may focus more on depth.This gives rise to difficulties for students at higher levels.
In a nutshell, the agreement with the issue raised in the question is qualified in its nature. although a national curriculum which is common is the need of the hour to mitigate discrimination among students with different background, it is also necessary to formulate this curriculum in consultation with policy makers from different states and societies in order to meet the specific reqiuirements of every student.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ndard curriculum therefore students who havent covered those topics will find it diffi...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ledge while one may focus more on depth.This gives rise to difficulties for students...
^^^^
Line 9, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...he question is qualified in its nature. although a national curriculum which is common i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2290.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16930022573 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97380053944 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483069977427 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0870798331 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.047619048 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0952380952 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211029050062 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696369744786 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045104832225 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128848551864 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357546626186 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.