City are now expanding, the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or disagree?
The effects of the expansion of cities which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of the traffic problem has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on government in recent years. It can be agreed that it is necessary for the government to take such steps to solve the commuting problems. This essay will elaborate how public transport can play a vital role in good transport system and how a better road system helps to enhance the daily transportation system and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why public transport system needs to upgrade but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that a public transportation such as buses, trains and trams are used by the commuters most frequently and majority of the people in cities prefer public transport over private cars. For example, a research indicates that 70% people in Sydney and Melbourne use public transport despite having a private car. Thus, it is necessary to improve the public transportation system so that the public can travel easily.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that usage of private car is also significant for a better commuting system as there are innumerable reasons for that but the most significant one is that private vehicle provide door-to-door service, so it saves a lot of time. For instance, research shows that users of public transports spend an hour extra on travelling everyday. Therefore, it is government responsibility to make good road systems so people can use their own vehicles.
From what has been discussed above, it can be agreed that significance of public transport is prominent but the way better roads save the time should not be overlooked.
- City are now expanding the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership Agree or disagree 88
- City are now expanding the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership Agree or disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 470, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n good transport system and how a better road system helps to enhance the daily t...
^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ansport over private cars. For example, a research indicates that 70% people in Sydney and...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sports spend an hour extra on travelling everyday. Therefore, it is government re...
^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...orts spend an hour extra on travelling everyday. Therefore, it is government responsibi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09060402685 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8617078992 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540268456376 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.9227532615 50.4703680194 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.909090909 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280873254032 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105678091774 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377265539475 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171205236459 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202791377406 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.