Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Only people who earn a lot of money are successful.
Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Indeed money is irreplaceable source to live in this modern competitive world, but it is not only one used to measure person's success. In my perspective, success can be estimated by the respect, fame and love for mankind. I would like to explore my points as follows: Successful is a person, who is respected due to one's benevolent deeds for welfare of poor. For instance, Mother teressa didn't not think for herself and contributed most of her life in arranging food, shelter, clothing and other necessitates for the needy and orphan kids. Her place in the history is indeed indebile, even after her death people remember her selflessness and kindness. Even though she did not possess immense fortune, she was known as one of the most successful person in history. On the other hand, affluent man restricting his wealth to love outrageously and not helping needy people during the time of calamities might not consider successful. There is a bone of contention when it comes to political leaders. Leaders who are not greedy for money and works for prosperity of a country and citizens inhabiting there are indeed considered su useful. For instance, narendra modi the prime minister of india opened up large chain of hospitals in many towns and cities for easily accessible and free emergency treatment for people below pervert line. In contrary, leaders who possess wealth and least interested in development of a country. High intellectual and cognitive level is another means people often use to measure success. Genius people such as Albert Einstein, Newton, Tesla, brook brothers etc are very well known for technological innovation, they might be ridiculed by others during their struggling years of life. But they proved themselves to the world that their blood, sweat and tears was worth more than any riches of the world by offering gift of new machines and inventions. To sum up, there are myriad ways to explain success such as helping others, acquiring fame, and benevolence. Money is required for fulfill basic needs but not only the one to judge one's success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-25 | Taniazehra | 3 | view |
| 2018-03-25 | Taniazehra | 3 | view |
| 2018-03-25 | Taniazehra | 76 | view |
| 2018-03-25 | Taniazehra | 76 | view |
| 2018-03-25 | Taniazehra | 76 | view |
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 76
- Success and Money 76
- TPO-18 Integrated essay 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. 85
- TPO-22 Integrated essay 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
Indeed money is irreplaceable source to live i...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld like to explore my points as follows: Successful is a person, who is respected...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re of poor. For instance, Mother teressa didnt not think for herself and contribu...
^^
Line 1, column 418, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... of poor. For instance, Mother teressa didnt not think for herself and contributed m...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 962, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lamities might not consider successful. There is a bone of contention when it co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alth and least interested in development of a country. ...
^^
Line 1, column 1500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nterested in development of a country. High intellectual and cognitive level is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1622, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ive level is another means people often use to measure success. Genius people such ...
^^^
Line 1, column 1653, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Genius) must be used with a third-person verb: 'peoples'.
Suggestion: peoples
...le often use to measure success. Genius people such as Albert Einstein, Newton, Tesla,...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2009, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng gift of new machines and inventions. To sum up, there are myriad ways to expl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2235, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...sic needs but not only the one to judge ones success.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, for instance, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00869565217 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67948400454 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611594202899 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4803699809 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0598093891242 0.236089414692 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0212561741238 0.076458572812 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0190148852296 0.0737576698707 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0598093891242 0.150856017488 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.