Talk about pros and cons of this era as it is full of daily inventions.

Essay topics:

Talk about pros and cons of this era as it is full of daily inventions.

The importance of invention which was debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of daily invention has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on current era in recent years. It can be said that, daily invention has bought positive influence, however, some people concern that invention can be negative. This essay will elaborate why invention are pivotal for progress in society and some invention can threaten peace of society and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

At the outset, there are numerous reasons why invention are necessary for the society to move in a positive direction, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that, we need efficient solutions in our lives. Example for instance, telecommunications technology, has shrunken the work and made it a close community. Moreover, machineries such as, washing machine, vacuum clears makes domestic chores easy and fun. Invention, therefore, plays a vital role in progress of the society in this contemporary era.

Nevertheless, some people adopt opposing views and believe that invention are significant in upsetting the world peace, as there are innumerable reasons for that, but the most predominant one lies in that fact that, humans barbaric behaviour. Example as an illustration, development of nuclear weapons has the world in fears jaw. Additionally, firearms are also lethal invention and result in distraction of world. Thus, some invention result in adversities.

For what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that invention are prominent, but distractive invention should not be overlooked.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-02-07 essay12 11 view
2020-08-04 sattar_iust 88 view
2020-07-23 navneet sidhu 77 view
2020-07-13 Gohar Khan 89 view
2020-07-05 sattar_iust 88 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that, we need efficient solutions in our lives. Example for instance, telecommuni...
^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... predominant one lies in that fact that, humans barbaric behaviour. Example as an...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49802371542 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06364143757 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600790513834 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6032489226 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0624976421949 0.242375264174 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0261607655803 0.0925447433944 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484107903648 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0339105663767 0.151781067708 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373169019072 0.0609392437508 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.