The traditional subjects are soon moving off in last year's. Kindly provide the solutions and ideas to save such subjects.
The importance of traditional subjects getting moved out of regular academics was always a debatable topic. Many people state that traditional subjects should be saved as it contributes knowledge to children in some or other way. I completely agree with the statement that subjects such as Math, Science and English are very important to present student. This essay would further elaborate the solutions and ideas how to save traditional subjects with justifying reasons and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To start with, learning subjects such as Math, Physics and Science will not only provide knowledge on specific area but also gives some interesting aspects of those subjects. But nowadays because of the extreme pressure and competitive job market students were forced to prepare and study for skills that are required for job market. Firstly, government has to come up with policy that should make traditional subjects mandatory in every school. In present competition world, English is the main source of communication to communicate with clients and onshore team. Students should be taught English.
Moreover, studying Math subject improves your creativity thinking. Students who solve problems in Math can solve any puzzle. For instance, students who studied Math, English and physics can choose their careers as lectures, teachers and professors in reputed colleges and universities. Further, schools has to take responsibility to encourage students to study our traditional subjects and teachers has to explain the importance of these subjects to them. School representatives and parents have to coordinate with each other, show the children our previous dramas, culture and tradition and how it is important to us in learning and improving our discipline.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to point that traditional subjects should be saved by the government and further the schools and parents should encourage and explain the importance of those subjects.
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this? Do you think this is a good or bad change? 72
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy Is it blessing or curse 67
- In academic studies grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good Give your opinion 89
- Government should reduce their investment in arts music and painting Agree or Disagree 86
- Whether parents should be held legally be responsible for children 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, thus, as to, for instance, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 8.36945812808 251% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 308.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54545454545 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90711174558 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.91514444 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.866666667 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192798267135 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670712874966 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585354718749 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128097449107 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677339792704 0.0609392437508 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.