Is cashless society realistic? What are the advantages and disadvantages.
Electronic transactions have become virtually inevitable part of almost every purchase in this century since credit cards came to life. Some people do not like carrying cash; others rely on the credit on their credit card. However, there are many disadvantages of becoming a cashless society as much as there are advantages. The following paragraphs will elaborate on both aspects of becoming a cash-free society and discuss whether it is realistic or not.
On one hand, credit cards provide individuals with a myriad of benefits. Without a doubt, the most conspicuous one is that its convenience. Nowadays, almost any product or service can be paid by credit card either online or via POS machine. For instance, people do not have to stand in the long queues for hours to pay their water or electricity bills. What is more, people do not have to carry heavy coins or bulky wallet which might be lost. On the other hand, these conveniences that the credit cards provide are not without any drawbacks. To begin with, many authorities such as governments and banks have access to personal information of the clients as well as their transaction records, which might be hacked and abused. Furthermore, electronic money is not tactile; therefore, there is not an actual transaction that one can see and feel, which makes it easier to spend money and harder to manage it.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that the merits associated with cashless payments outweigh its downsides. However, an entirely cashless society is not realistic given the fact that there are many unbanked people due to poverty.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08582089552 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72109600051 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585820895522 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2348581157 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3571428571 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.25397266985 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120255100966 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447400742443 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698670648427 0.071462118173 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1079777732 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713542771891 0.0609392437508 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.