The chart shows the average life expectancy for males and females in 1900, 1950 and 1990
The table compares the average life span for the genders from five different countries in three separate time periods. At first glance, it is obvious that the median number of years which people lived increased from 1900 to 1990 and women generally lived l than men.
By 1900 the average life expectancy in five countries was low. There are a gradual difference in the life span; Australian life span was the lowest with 37.8 for males and 39.9 for females, while the figures for Sweden was the highest in both men and women, at 52.8 and 55.3 respectively.
In 1950, there was a rapid growth in the life expectancy. The number of years people from five countries lived fluctuated between 62 and just over 70.
By 1990, both males and females of all countries lived the longest of three time periods. The country that had the longest life span was still Sweden and Danish had the lowest life span, while the average life expectancy from the rest of countries were approximately 73 for males and 80 for females.
- The table below gives information on average hours and minutes spent by UK males and females on different daily activities 81
- Music is played in every society and culture in the world today Some people believe that music brings only benefits to individuals and societies Others however think that music can have a negative influence on both Discuss both these views and give your o 63
- Failure is proof that the desire wasn't strong enoughTo what extent do you agree with this statement? 61
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 55
- It is very important for people to be able to speak more than one language therefore children should start learning a foreign language as young as possible Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and women generally lived l than men. By 1900 the average life expectancy in f...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... women, at 52.8 and 55.3 respectively. In 1950, there was a rapid growth in the...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...luctuated between 62 and just over 70. By 1990, both males and females of all c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75280898876 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32487223959 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522471910112 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.756668038 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318650722359 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148570767345 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810593607797 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192151652324 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857802445888 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.