Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important
characteristics for a politician or leader is good communication ability.
What on earth matters most for a political leader? Is proficient communicating skills the premier ability required? As far as I am concerned, despite its significance for politicians, it is far from being the most vital one.
Admittedly, it is true that with an advantage on talking and communicating, the politician may have an edge on maintaining relationships and boosting bonds with other countries. For instance, without the remarkable speeches and convincing debating, Obama could hardly be elected as the president. After becoming a president, it was his distinguished speech abilities and interpersonal skills that eased the intense diplomatic relationship with China, since he visited China in person and built congenial values upon some sensitive problems with China, always ending up the conversations with a smile on Chairman Xi’s face. Therefore, being well-acquainted with communicating poses positive influences on the work of politicians.
However, let’s not jump to the conclusion too fast. In terms of political field, the policies and regulations that the political leaders implement on the society seem to weigh far more than the communication. Since there are thousands of talents that could help translate or deliver the contents of the speeches and conversations, as long as politicians have the main idea of what policies to institute and what rules he tend to establish, the output of those contents could not be a big worry, as it could be guaranteed by the elites. Take one of China’s political leaders, Teng Siao-Peng, as an example. Although he had an accent, which means that he could only talk in local dialect, what he has done was to change the entire economic fundamental structure. More importantly, his policies about endowing companies the right to develop independently and encouraging connections with other countries produce profound and thorough influences on every corner of the society. In conclusion, politicians do not necessarily have to be equipped with outstanding communication skills, in contrast, how ingenious and beneficial their implements are seems to contribute more to a political leader’s success.
Hereby I have made myself quite clear: imperative communication ability could be great merits for politicians, but it definitely is not the most determinant one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-03 | saeid.rashidi66 | 63 | view |
| 2018-05-17 | KalynIsMe | 78 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most importantcharacteristics for a politician or leader is good communication ability. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement : Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. 73
- Which way do you think is the best for a student to make new friends a joining a sports team b participating in community activities c traveling 97
- Do you agree or disagree with the parents should let children make mistake and let them learn from their own mistake 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tends'.
Suggestion: tends
...policies to institute and what rules he tend to establish, the output of those conte...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54596100279 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28147182759 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604456824513 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.0259392406 48.9658058833 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.733333333 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9333333333 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166900305822 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604384701689 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516731771488 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114251604295 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296659744218 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.01818996416 125% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.