The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000
The line graph illustrates the rate of birth changed in China and the USA from 1920 to 2000.
Overall, the figure for birth rates of both nations followed a downward trend over the period of 80 years. It is notable that the birth rate of the US was higher than that of China in most years.
Starting with above 10% in 1920, the percentage of birth rate in America fluctuated slightly by 2% in the first 20 years. Then this trend hitted the lowest point of under 5% in the year 1945, but later climbed rapidly to 15% in 1950. During the last 50 years, the ratio of live births in the US declined gradually to 7%.
From 1920 to 1935, China birth rate experienced a significant oscillation from 10 % to 15% before reaching a low at 5% in the next 10 years. Then the percentage of babies born witnessed a record high of 20% in China during 1950; however it decreased sharply by 10% in 5 years later and continued fall to about 2% in 2000.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-12-11 | thaiha123 | 78 | view |
2023-08-21 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 89 | view |
2023-07-31 | teulimin.06 | 67 | view |
2023-07-26 | trucvy112233 | 73 | view |
2023-07-04 | dhq.testbig | 78 | view |
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 78
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 78
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 762.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.30508474576 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29078501784 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581920903955 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7489495613 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313969517831 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155017364975 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16685665672 0.0843802449381 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248762599747 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189299176452 0.0819641961636 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.72 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.