Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of personal development as the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of professional career is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am tremendously inclined to believe that personal behavior can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, individual behavior can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of respect to others as well as the enhanced knowledge, are inextricably bound up. According to my own example, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the practical skills. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the career analysis and the one’s communication ability apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, individual performance might increase the consequences of leading society in wrong way. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the faulty system could relate to this reality that the demerits of dangerous attitude pertain to kill someone’s life. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious college has asserted that the downside of the horrible communication is correlated negatively with the down-image. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the separate performance.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of personal development as the base to improve the quality of life far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of good nature prove the significance of the well-being, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-17 | Ekta shah | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Nainajovitta | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Nainajovitta | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Sidra018 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | sajid.uett | 77 | view |
- Should University penalize students for late submission of their work? 88
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples. 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- which is the most pressing problem in the today's world? discuss problems and solutions. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63604240283 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30085271001 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625441696113 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9857780154 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.916666667 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231026035591 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707815980985 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125693937025 0.071462118173 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125550577534 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11635816055 0.0609392437508 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.