If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
Goal is something we want to achieve. To achieve goal we must have to take some steps which leads to our goal. Everyone has different goals and for certain people their goal is worthy with other find worthless. According to statement, any means taken to attain goal are justifiable if goal is worthy. To achieve goal in any means is sometime dangerous. When goal is worthy for large number of people then doing anything to achieve is justifiable.
Everyone has their own goals. And goals can be anything. Goal can be earning money, score a good high, wining something, helping people etc. But some goals are not worthy for some people that are worthy for others. For example, for a rich people earning money is not a worthy goal but for a middle class people earning money is only goal which is worthy. So, whether goal is worthy or not may be different for different people.
Even if a goal is worthy but it should be achieve with a fairness. If people do whatever to achieve goal leads to some serious problems and it can be harmful as well. For example, if middle class people robbed bank for money because their goal is earning money is harmful. Earning money rightfully is justifiable rather than robbing bank. So, to achieve goal, everyone should take proper steps.
Sometimes doing anything to achieve goal is also necessary. Like, Environmentalist’s goal is to save environment. On other side, chemical company’s waste pollute environment. So, environmentalist do anything against chemical company is necessary to preserve environment. In this type of scenario, any means taken to attain goal is justifiable.
In conclusion, I believed that every goal is worthy and every goal is different to different people but to achieve by any means leads to harmful problems. Taking good means to achieve goals is justifiable but as given above example of middle class people, it leads to very dangerous problems. Taking any means to attain goal even if goal is worthy, may be very harmful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 70 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Nowshin Tabassum | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | Hitesh2411 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- should college be free for everyone? 70
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 50
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company."Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One 50
- Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient. Other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'achieved'?
Suggestion: achieved
...en if a goal is worthy but it should be achieve with a fairness. If people do whatever ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94985250737 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77221796339 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412979351032 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4060885817 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.12 118.986275619 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.56 23.4991977007 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.48 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362913518025 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132449868459 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154724852842 0.0758088955206 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239344452435 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135527291517 0.0667264976115 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.66 8.38706741573 79% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 100.480337079 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.8971910112 38% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.