Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
In today’s world, one of the most increasing problems is increasing numbers of vehicles on roads. Some people believe that government should build more roads to accommodate more vehicles. While others argue that government should improve the public transportation’s network. I am inclined to believe that government should improve the network of public transportation. This essay will discuss both side in details and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, the first and foremost, government should concentrate on improving the public transportation’s network, provide better connectivity among city and make it affordable for all class of people. Government should encourage people to opt it for daily commute which will reduce the number of vehicles on road means less traffic and less pollution. For example, according to news, Delhi metro helped government to control the traffic related issue and it also reduced up to 10 percent in the capital city. Therefore, improved public transportation is provide space to breath both people and environment.
On the flip side, more private vehicles on road required more roads to have sufficient space for the vehicles. Private vehicles surely help people to save a lot of time and energy by opting for daily travel but more vehicles on road also can lead to have more chances of road accidents, more traffic and more pollution. For instance, in Sydney the numbers of vehicle increased from 20% to 60 % and road accident rates also increased in last decade. So, the numbers of roads increased drastically.
In conclusion, the forgoing discussion propound the view that improved network of public transportation is more essential than the more road construction as it saves our environment and planet. So, I believe government should improve the network of public transportation and encourage people to use public transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | nganvuong | 55 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | honorrr | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | jashan randhawa | 77 | view |
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Give your response with justification. 85
- Communication has changed significantly in the last ten years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change.Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 88
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. 80
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport 90
- A recent study has shown that over 50% of school children cannot write legibly. The researchers concluded that the widespread use of smartphones, tablets and computers by children from as young as 12 months old was to blame. We are now living in a “post 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...fore, improved public transportation is provide space to breath both people and environ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.5418719212 28% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 5.75862068966 365% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45454545455 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17754582053 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508417508418 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2870195955 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.542669832139 0.242375264174 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194829189346 0.0925447433944 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130938651459 0.071462118173 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.360749528596 0.151781067708 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984054852571 0.0609392437508 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.