The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994-98.
The second chart shows their destinations over the same period.
The given information shows reasons why people in UK went overseas and their destinations between 1994 and 1998. Overall, there was an increasing number of UK travellers over the period and holiday is a primary purpose for travelling. In addition, Western Europe was an ideal place for most of them.
It can be seen from the table that more and more people in UK travelled overseas during the given period and the most enormous figure of UK inhabitants toured for holiday, at around 15,200 and 20,700 in 1994 and 1998 respectively. However, fewer than 4000 residents in UK went to foreign countries for business and visiting to friends and relatives. Besides, there was a small quantity of people travelling due to other reasons.
Similarly, in the bar chart, the number of UK visitors experienced an upward trend from 1994 to 1998 in all three destinations. It is evident that Western Europe was the most favorite region of which an average number of people during the period was 21,000. By contrast, North America and other areas seemed to be the less preferred locations, around 1500 and 2200 during five years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | snowsss | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | Adeola Nafisat | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | marin123 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | tam362 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | lunanguyen0701 | 78 | view |
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994-98.The second chart shows their destinations over the same period. 78
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 51
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, similarly, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95238095238 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61119554068 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582010582011 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6653943835 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187877269142 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783152852205 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539885438374 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133671849767 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441357159077 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.