Essay topics:
The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
The given linear graph depicts the information about the recycled of four types of material during the years 1982 to 2010 by a particular nation. The data is calibrated in per centum.
Overall, it is evident that, the recycled of aluminium cans had been increased with the passage of time expect others.
It can be clearly seen that, in the case of, glass containers firstly, it was fifty percent recycled which had been 15 percent less than the paper and cardboard during the year of 1982. Apart from this, from the year 1982 to till 1994 the recycled percentage of paper and cardboard had been ...
Votes
Essay Categories
Essays by user Rajan khehra
:
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household and the table shows the amount of electricity used according to the number of occupants Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparison 68
- Nowadays there is a growing trend of private car ownership. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages or environmental problems associated with this? 67
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce the consumption for fossil fuels such as gas oil and coal To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement Give your own opinion 88
- The Pie Charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Many people believe that the use of new technology improves lives of employees. Other think it's a disadvantage for them. Discuss both point of views and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: WAS_BEEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'was' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: was; has been
... of time the recycled of aluminium cans was been rockted in sequence to till the year 20...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.815 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55635971647 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3358121176 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187652927826 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919040340065 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907517734248 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130082619201 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883665009192 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.