Some people think law changes human behaviour. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of law changes human behaviour and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive. I am inclined to believe that changing human behavior can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the effect of laws on human behaviour can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, altering human behavior by a law might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of rule needs could relate to this reality that the demerits of some law reform pertain to legislative changes. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the influence of a law on human behaviour far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 74 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-03-23 | Nina Tsarevich | 77 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | topraveesh | 77 | view |
| 2024-01-24 | topraveesh | 80 | view |
- Do you think card-less society is realistic and why? 88
- Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 88
- The violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?OrShould government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of p 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59479553903 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15201740479 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650557620818 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5547950613 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.416666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20386783401 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664971040849 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622755284421 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11766717165 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252510018591 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.13 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.