Some people think human behaviors can be changed by laws, while others think laws have little effect. What is your opinion.
Recently, human behaviors have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it advantageous or not?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that law’s effects are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the law’s effects standpoint, logical behaviors are bound up inextricably with law’s issues, which indicates they lead to both society’s behaviors and law’s improvements. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between emotional behaviors and effective laws as well as an exponential increase in human preferences. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the likelihood of y1 is correlated positively to not only law’s effects but also human behaviors.
Within the realm of law’s effects, without the slightest doubt, logical behaviors attribute to law’s issues, in that it would come down to society’s behaviors, law’s improvements, and emotional behaviors. A salient example of such attribution is effective laws, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take human preferences for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint society’s behaviors problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of human behaviors.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that the advantages of human behaviors are of more significance.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-01-26 | topraveesh | 77 | view |
2022-11-26 | Resham | 77 | view |
2020-11-13 | yasamin62 | 77 | view |
2020-11-13 | yasamin62 | 77 | view |
2020-09-09 | sattar_iust | 77 | view |
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 55
- It is harder for children growing up in the 21st century than it was in the past How far do you agree with this statement Give your opinions 85
- What can make learning a new foreign language unimportant Give your example and explanation 88
- In some companies some employers involve employees in the decision making process of products and services What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a policy 85
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7366255144 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20792913386 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633744855967 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0895679271 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.4 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264079897895 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100576515272 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515713845106 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151288621129 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601058735778 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.