In some companies, some employers involve employees in the decision-making process of products and services. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a policy?
Recently, employees’ involution has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it advantageous or not?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that decision-making processes are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the decision-making processes standpoint, the product’s processes are bound up inextricably with the service’s processes, which indicates they lead to both employee effects and decision-making issues. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between product cycles and customer services as well as an exponential increase in employees’ management. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of employees’ effects is correlated positively with not only decision-making processes but also employees’ involution.
Within the realm of decision-making processes, without the slightest doubt, product processes attribute to service processes, in that it would come down to employees’ effects, decision-making issues, and product cycles. A salient example of such attribution is customers’ services, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take employees’ management for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint decision-making issues and problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of employees’ involutions.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that the advantages of employees’ involution are of more significance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
- As cities expanding some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population What s your opinion Give some examples or experien 79
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 77
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 77
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 55
- Some people think human behaviors can be changed by laws while others think laws have little effect What is your opinion 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15384615385 5.00649968141 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.65537498716 2.71678728327 135% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651821862348 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9456068232 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.0 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305564733436 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112750748796 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716106441246 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166583702395 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666639427946 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 12.6369458128 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.69 11.5310837438 162% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.