Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning CAN WORK WELL in high schools or colleges?
These days there is an ongoing debate among people on experiential learning versus traditional learning. Although many individuals consider learning by doing is the best methodology, a number of people hold an opposite view. This essay will discuss why experiential learning works well in high schools and colleges.
To begin with, there are multiple reasons why I support experiential learning. The first and foremost is that the students get involved consciously in whatever they do as part of the experiential learning process and it tends to stay longer in their memory. Secondly, it involves physical actions and not just mugging up books. The students exactly know what to do and how. For instance, a student who actually measures the temperature of boiling water will remember the boiling point value better than a student who just read and learn it. Consequently, it is very clear that experiential learning is advantageous.
However, there is no doubt that learning by doing has many negative aspects as well. But the advantages of experiential learning outweighs its disadvantages. For example, a recent study by a group of eminent scientists shows that the high school students who underwent experiential learning showed better results in their academics compared to the traditional ones. Thus, it is obvious that experiential learning works well in formal education compared to traditional teaching.
To put it in a nutshell, while there are several convincing arguments on both sides, my opinion depicts that experiential learning is an efficient way in formal education and gives fruitful output.
- The information revolution by modern mass communication has both positive and negative consequences for individuals and for society To what extent do you agree Explain with your own experience 88
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning CAN WORK WELL in high schools or colleges? 77
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 55
- It is harder for children growing up in the 21st century than it was in the past How far do you agree with this statement Give your opinions 85
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most a 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation compared to traditional teaching. To put it in a nutshell, while there are...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, however, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41106719368 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98612349983 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592885375494 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2804380349 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7857142857 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.25397266985 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414491708494 0.242375264174 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151394379977 0.0925447433944 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907104371484 0.071462118173 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252407491441 0.151781067708 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116138008117 0.0609392437508 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.