Should marketing in companies producing consumer goods like food and clothing, place emphasis on reputation of the company or short-term strategies like discount and special offers? Why?
Recently, Companies’ marketing has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "is it advantageous or not?". Whereas it is a widely held view that consumer goods are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the consumer goods standpoint, companies’ reputation is bound up inextricably with Short-term strategies, which indicates they both lead to reasonable discounts and healthy foods. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between modern clothing and special offers as well as an exponential increase in online marketing. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of reasonable discounts is correlated positively with not only consumer goods but also Companies’ marketing.
Within the realm of consumer goods, without the slightest doubt, companies’ reputation attributes to Short-term strategies, in that it would come down to reasonable discounts, healthy foods, and modern clothing. A salient example of such attribution is special offers, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take online marketing for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint healthy food problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of Companies’ marketing.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that the advantages of Companies’ marketing are of more significance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-06 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2024-02-06 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 55
- It is harder for children growing up in the 21st century than it was in the past How far do you agree with this statement Give your opinions 85
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning CAN WORK WELL in high schools or colleges? 77
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most a 85
- As the urban population grows traffic is heavy and public areas such as parking lots are packed What solutions do you think can address such problems 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8893442623 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30050884564 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647540983607 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6115117048 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.7 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253773743494 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904762343734 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527208284148 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134943244022 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608225833298 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8893442623 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30050884564 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647540983607 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6115117048 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.7 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253773743494 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904762343734 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527208284148 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134943244022 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608225833298 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.