As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
These days there is an ongoing discussion among people that governments should focus on building better public transport networks over roads. Although many individuals consider this as both positive and constructive, a number of people hold an opposite view. This essay will discuss why governments should focus more on building public transport systems.
To begin with, there are a number of reasons why I support the idea of building better public transport. First and foremost is that public transport systems are always economic for the common people. Secondly, it causes less pollution and is more environment-friendly. For instance, 20 people traveling on a bus is always efficient compared to 20 people driving their own vehicles. Consequently, it is quite clear that the public mode of transport is quite advantageous.
However, there is no doubt that the lack of roads can cause various negative outcomes. A nation cannot develop without better roads and they form an integral part in mobility and connectivity. But the advantages of implementing a good public transport system always outweighs the advantages of building roads. For example, a recent study conducted by eminent scientists shows that 80% of the people prefer public transports over private vehicles. Thus, it is quite obvious that governments should focus more on building a better network of public transport.
To put it in a nutshell, while there are several convincing arguments on both sides, my opinion depicts that the governments should give more attention in building better public transport facilities over roads because it’ll benefit the nations in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-12 | Yuli | 77 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | Yuli | 77 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 85 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 55 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 88 | view |
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning CAN WORK WELL in high schools or colleges? 77
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 77
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 77
- It is harder for children growing up in the 21st century than it was in the past How far do you agree with this statement Give your opinions 85
- What can make learning a new foreign language unimportant Give your example and explanation 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41698841699 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93324506242 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552123552124 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0758997103 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.214285714 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308130411653 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107872884234 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679222671956 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196620851053 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012583316206 0.0609392437508 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.