It is harder for children growing up in the 21st century than it was in the past. How far do you agree with this statement? Give your opinions.
Recently, growing up in the 21st century has sparked an ongoing controversy which inevitably leads to a moot question "is it advantageous or not?". Whereas it is a widely held view that children's issues are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the children's issues standpoint, 21st-century facilities are bound up inextricably with harder lives, which indicates they lead to both children's achievements and 21st-century education. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between children's behaviours and harder standards as well as an exponential increase in 21st-century changes. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of children's achievements is correlated positively to not only children's issues but also growing up in the 21st century.
Within the realm of children's issues, without the slightest doubt, 21st-century facilities attribute to harder lives, in that it would come down to children's achievements, 21st-century education, and children's behaviours. A salient example of such attribution is harder standards, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take 21st-century changes for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint 21st-century education problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of growing up in the 21st century.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes " all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that the advantages of growing up in the 21st century are of more significance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-24 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2024-04-24 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2021-04-13 | vahidmetall | 72 | view |
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 77
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning CAN WORK WELL in high schools or colleges? 77
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 77
- It is harder for children growing up in the 21st century than it was in the past How far do you agree with this statement Give your opinions 85
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is foolish To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 579, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts is correlated positively to not only childrens issues but also growing up in ...
^^
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ing goes ' alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73180076628 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32106342613 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.4585837064 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.6 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3352243335 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134023062079 0.0925447433944 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526304476135 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193345931801 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613420017994 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.