The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in Europe country between 1979 and 2004.
the graph illustrates changes in the amount of beef common lamp, chicken and fish consumed in a particular European country between 1979 and 2004.
in 1979, beef was by far the most popular of these foods, with about 225 grams consumed per person per week. lamp and chicken eaten in similar quantities (around 150 grams), while much less fish was consumed (just over 50 grams).
However, during this 25 years period the consumption of beef and lamb fell dramatically to approximately 100 grams and 500 grams respectively. The consumption of fish also declined, but much less significantly to just below 50 grams, so although it seems remained the least popular food, consumption levels were the most stable. The consumption of chicken, on the other hand, showed an upward trend, undertaking that of lamb in 1980 and that of beef in 1989. By 2004 it had sold two almost 250 grams per person per week.
Overall, the graph shows how the consumption of chicken increased dramatically, while the popularity of these other foods decreased over the period.
- Nowadays, people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do this disadvantages of throwaway society outway anypossible economic disadvantage. 84
- should there be minimum school going age or should students and their parents are free to decide when they join School. to what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
- what problems will your country face in next 10 years how can these problems be overcome 72
- The diagram shows the stages and equipment used in cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 61
- what problems will your country face in next 10 years? how can we problems be overcome? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the graph illustrates changes in the amount...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...opean country between 1979 and 2004. in 1979, beef was by far the most popular ...
^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lamp
...225 grams consumed per person per week. lamp and chicken eaten in similar quantities...
^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun fish is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...quantities around 150 grams, while much less fish was consumed just over 50 grams. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99431818182 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66505135198 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607954545455 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8892958764 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.875 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202186304992 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878677815901 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071590591226 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136024226476 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756257828406 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.