The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The two tables provide information the amount of money spent on Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in five European countries namely, UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, Sweden in the year of 1999 and 2004.
Overall, the UK was the highest amount of sale for fairtrade-labelled coffee while Switzerland sales on bananas in 2004. The majority countries sales were increased on those products and the biggest rise sales were in the UK and Switzerland.
According to the first table, in 1999, in terms of selling coffee, the largest amount of coffee sale in the Switzerland which was 3 million euro but after five years the highest amount selling coffee observed in UK was 20 million euro in 2004. The sales amount of coffee in Denmark, Belgium, Sweden were 1.8, 1, 0.8 million euro respectively in 1999 and these amount increased after five years which were 2, 1.7 and 1 million euro in 2004. Sweden was lowest amount of coffee sales in both years.
On the second table, Switzerland was the largest amount of fairtrade-labelled of bananas was sold was 15 million of euro which was the largest amount among four countries. The amount of money was increased in 2004 was 47 million euro which was more than three time higher than 1999. The amount of bananas sold in the Uk and Belgium were 1, 0.6 million euro and the amount raised to 5.5 and 4 million respectively. Interestingly, the sales amount decreased in Sweden and Denmark in 2004 than that of 1999.
- Women are better at childcare than men therefore they should focus more on raising children and less on their working life To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 76
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 67
- The graph above shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 61
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 56
- Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the lowest'.
Suggestion: was the lowest
...1.7 and 1 million euro in 2004. Sweden was lowest amount of coffee sales in both years. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8875502008 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82054685991 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.389558232932 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2879733758 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.7 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260643619043 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144181334013 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102353226989 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219349207821 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971984761621 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.