Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There have been conflicts about whether is it fair for famous sports professionals to earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. In my opinion, I agree that sportspeople deserve to receive such amount of money.
People might say people in other more important professions, such as doctors, scientists, etc. are more justified to a greater deal of money comparing to sportspeople. It is logical when these people are the ones who contribute to the development of the world. Without them, there would be no advanced technology, and the world could not be like how it is today. As a result, their priceless contributions should be recognized by a great deal of money. Moreover, sportspeople sometimes spend their money on stuffs like bars or alcohols, thus they are not deserved to have much money.
On the other hand, is it totally sensible for famous sportspeople to earn a larger number of money than in other professions. First, they have to complete countless harsh trainings to become such talent. For example, a famous footballer started learning to play professionally since he or she was six or seven years old. Apart from skills training, he or she must endure intensive physical training in the gym in order to ensure adequate energy for best performance. Secondly, they take part in international competitions and become icons, for their nations, and for their sports. For instance, Roger Federer is currently the sportsperson who has the highest earnings, he has won 18 Grand Slams and nearly 100 ATP champions, and he is the national icon of Switzerland and the legend of tennis.
In conclusion, I agree that successful sports professionals earning a great deal more money than people in other important professions is fully justified.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | happyhappy | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Sadrarouhi | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | morbymuku | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | ngannguyen | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | WIWI UMAR | 61 | view |
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant. 67
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- In some countries, it is usual for young people who graduate from high school to spend a year working or travelling before going to university.What are the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: or
...play professionally since he or she was six or seven years old. Apart from skills trai...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1023890785 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9611398275 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576791808874 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7177825523 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304981015535 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112399064008 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134332372313 0.0667982634062 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256920977582 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13659661328 0.056905535591 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.