The chart below shows Morocco’s income from different economic sectors in 2003 as well as its income from fishing from 1982 to 2003.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the charts below.
The pie chart illustrates, the account of income from six various financial divisions in 2003 and together with the amount of income from fishing in Moroccos during the year of 1982 and 2003.
Overall, the majority of financial set up arise in given country by tourism. Likewise, the least source of economic section was agriculture in the year of 2003.
As figured in the chart, tourism department makes up Moroccos economic status to 26% which is two percentage higher in contrast to industry which is 24% . Moreover, the amount of income from workers remittance also had a significant sector of income which is 21% in 2003.
Regarding petroleum and fishing was the another category of economic section which was considerably similar or small percentage difference such as, 14% and 13 % respectively. Furthermore, agriculture division represents, mere 2% income in Moroccow over the period given. These three sectors had given less than 20% for nation's economic status.
- Nowadays more and more older people compete with younger people for the same jobs What are the reasons for this What are the solutions to solve this 84
- Organized tour to remote community and other countries is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment? 89
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The given graphs represents number of students in uk from 1991 to 2001 and government expenditure and different family economic bakground 49
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt, tourism department makes up Moroccos economic status to 26% which is two per...
^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...akes up Moroccos economic status to 26% which is two percentage higher in contra...
^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...her in contrast to industry which is 24% . Moreover, the amount of income from wor...
^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...had a significant sector of income which is 21% in 2003. Regarding petroleum ...
^^
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eum and fishing was the another category of economic section which was considerab...
^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...agriculture division represents, mere 2% income in Moroccow over the period give...
^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure division represents, mere 2% income in Moroccow over the period given. These...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, likewise, moreover, regarding, so, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27564102564 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80845114839 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0211241906 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.875 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 5.23603664747 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316291575479 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122239891637 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121790976629 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191852321039 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128852823384 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.